[Raw
data] [50 most cited papers]
[50 most relevant papers]
[cites used to compute IF]
[Recent
citations ][Frequent citing
series ] [more data in
EconPapers]
[
trace new citations] [Missing
citations? Add them now]
[Incorrect content? Let us
know]
| IF | AIF | CIF | IF5 | DOC | CDO | CIT | NCI | CCU | D2Y | C2Y | D5Y | C5Y | SC | %SC | CiY | II | AII | |
| 1990 | 0 | 0.14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.07 | |||||
| 1991 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.06 | |||||
| 1992 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.07 | |||||
| 1993 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.07 | |||||
| 1994 | 0 | 0.13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.06 | |||||
| 1995 | 0 | 0.18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.09 | |||||
| 1996 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.11 | |||||
| 1997 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.12 | |||||
| 1998 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | |||||
| 1999 | 0 | 0.32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
| 2000 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
| 2001 | 0 | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.22 | |||||
| 2002 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.24 | |||||
| 2003 | 0 | 0.41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.24 | |||||
| 2004 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.27 | |||||
| 2005 | 0 | 0.49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.29 | |||||
| 2006 | 0 | 0.48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.26 | |||||
| 2007 | 0 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.22 | |||||
| 2008 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.23 | |||||
| 2009 | 0 | 0.43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.23 | |||||
| 2010 | 0 | 0.37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
| 2011 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | |||||
| 2012 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.26 | |||||
| 2013 | 0 | 0.52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.24 | |||||
| 2014 | 0 | 0.55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.28 | |||||
| 2015 | 0 | 0.54 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.28 | |||||
| 2016 | 0 | 0.58 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.29 | |||
| 2017 | 0.6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | |||
| 2018 | 0.62 | 0.6 | 0.75 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.33 |
| IF: | Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y |
| AIF: | Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y |
| CIF: | Cumulative impact factor |
| IF5: | Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y |
| DOC: | Number of documents published in year y |
| CDO: | Cumulative number of documents published until year y |
| CIT: | Number of citations to papers published in year y |
| NCI: | Number of citations in year y |
| CCU: | Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y |
| D2Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
| C2Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
| D5Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
| C5Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
| SC: | selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
| %SC: | Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
| CiY: | Cites in year y to documents published in year y |
| II: | Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents. |
| AII: | Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y |
| # | Year | Title | Cited |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | Why do patents facilitate trade in technology? Testing the disclosure and appropriation effects. (2016). Webster, Elizabeth ; Palangkaraya, Alfons ; de Rassenfosse, Gaetan. In: Working Papers. RePEc:iip:wpaper:2. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 11 |
| 2 | 2015 | On the price elasticity of demand for trademarks. (2015). de Rassenfosse, Gaetan. In: Working Papers. RePEc:iip:wpaper:1. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
| # | Year | Title | Cited |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | Why do patents facilitate trade in technology? Testing the disclosure and appropriation effects. (2016). Webster, Elizabeth ; Palangkaraya, Alfons ; de Rassenfosse, Gaetan. In: Working Papers. RePEc:iip:wpaper:2. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 9 |
| Year | Title | |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Application publication or confirmation of grant: Which matters more for academic technology transfer?. (2018). Wright, Brian ; Drivas, Kyriakos ; Lei, Zhen. In: International Journal of Industrial Organization. RePEc:eee:indorg:v:56:y:2018:i:c:p:204-228. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | |
| 2018 | Bulding ambidexterity through creativity mechanisms: Contextual drivers of innovation success. (2018). Revilla, Elena ; Rodriguez-Prado, Beatriz. In: Research Policy. RePEc:eee:respol:v:47:y:2018:i:9:p:1611-1625. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | |
| 2018 |
| Year | Citing document | |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Contracting for technology transfer: patent licensing and know-how in Brazil. (2016). Zuniga, Pluvia ; MartÃÂnez, Catalina ; Martinez, Catalina. In: MERIT Working Papers. RePEc:unm:unumer:2016065. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | |
| 2016 | The Economics of Patent Backlog. (2016). Zaby, Alexandra ; de Rassenfosse, Gaetan. In: Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change. RePEc:zbw:vfsc16:145673. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |