[Raw
data] [50 most cited papers]
[50 most relevant papers]
[cites used to compute IF]
[Recent
citations ][Frequent citing
series ] [more data in
EconPapers]
[
trace new citations] [Missing
citations? Add them now]
[Incorrect content? Let us
know]
| IF | AIF | CIF | IF5 | DOC | CDO | CIT | NCI | CCU | D2Y | C2Y | D5Y | C5Y | SC | %SC | CiY | II | AII | |
| 1990 | 0 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
| 1991 | 0 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
| 1992 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | |||||
| 1993 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | |||||
| 1994 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0.06 | |||||
| 1995 | 0 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0.08 | |||||
| 1996 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | |||||
| 1997 | 0 | 0.23 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | |||||
| 1998 | 0 | 0.27 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0.12 | |||||
| 1999 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0.14 | |||||
| 2000 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | |||||
| 2001 | 0 | 0.36 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0.16 | |||||
| 2002 | 0 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
| 2003 | 0 | 0.41 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
| 2004 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
| 2005 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0.22 | |||||
| 2006 | 0 | 0.47 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
| 2007 | 0 | 0.42 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||||
| 2008 | 0 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 77 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
| 2009 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
| 2010 | 0 | 0.44 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | |||||
| 2011 | 0 | 0.46 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 97 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
| 2012 | 0 | 0.47 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 8 | 105 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | |||
| 2013 | 0 | 0.53 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 112 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0.22 | |||||
| 2014 | 0 | 0.55 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 120 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||
| 2015 | 0 | 0.55 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 10 | 130 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 36 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||
| 2016 | 0 | 0.56 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 140 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | |||||
| 2017 | 0 | 0.58 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 8 | 148 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 43 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | |||
| 2018 | 0 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 158 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0.28 | |||||
| 2019 | 0.88 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0 | 158 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 1 | 46 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.33 |
| IF: | Impact Factor: C2Y / D2Y |
| AIF: | Average Impact Factor for series in RePEc in year y |
| CIF: | Cumulative impact factor |
| IF5: | Impact Factor: C5Y / D5Y |
| DOC: | Number of documents published in year y |
| CDO: | Cumulative number of documents published until year y |
| CIT: | Number of citations to papers published in year y |
| NCI: | Number of citations in year y |
| CCU: | Cumulative number of citations to papers published until year y |
| D2Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
| C2Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
| D5Y: | Number of articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
| C5Y: | Cites in y to articles published in y-1 until y-5 |
| SC: | selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
| %SC: | Percentage of selft citations in y to articles published in y-1 plus y-2 |
| CiY: | Cites in year y to documents published in year y |
| II: | Immediacy Index: CiY / Documents. |
| AII: | Average Immediacy Index for series in RePEc in year y |
| # | Year | Title | Cited |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | Models as signs as good economic models. (2012). Crespo, Ricardo. In: Estudios Economicos. RePEc:uns:esteco:v:29:y:2012:i:58:p:1-12. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 2 |
| 2 | Los hábitos de consumo de los obreros industriales de BahÃa Blanca. (1966). Bacic, Uros. In: Estudios Economicos. RePEc:uns:esteco:v:5:y:1966:i:9-10:p:113-120. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 | |
| 3 | 2017 | Study of efficiency and information transmission for agricultural futures markets: a comparative analysis between Buenos Aires and Chicago using monthly and daily data. (2017). Lachman, Jeremias ; Jack, Pablo. In: Estudios Economicos. RePEc:uns:esteco:v:34:y:2017:i:69:p:3-23. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
| 4 | 2008 | Vida, pasión y muerte de la convertibilidad en Argentina. (2008). Escudé, Guillermo ; Beker, Victor ; Escude, Guillermo J. In: Estudios Economicos. RePEc:uns:esteco:v:25:y:2008:i:50:p:1-36. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper | 1 |
| # | Year | Title | Cited |
|---|
| Year | Title | |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Evaluación de la hipótesis de eficiencia débil y análisis de causalidad en las centrales de abastos de Colombia. (2019). Garavito-Hernandez, Edwin Alberto ; Lamos-Diaz, Henry ; Talero-Sarmiento, Leonardo Hernan. In: Revista Apuntes del Cenes. RePEc:col:000152:017357. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |